Stardate S03E16

Sean K. Gabriel
Captainā€™s Log: Supplemental

--

Mood: šŸ„µ. Less proactive, more reactive as of late. Seems like somethingā€™s a bit off with my game.

Approaching the Jardin Anglais from Pont du Mont-Blanc, Geneva

šŸŒ¹ What am I grateful for this week?

Turns out people were pretty understanding when I needed to shuffle my plans around. I usually try to avoid doing this as I hate inconveniencing others (yet I can see itā€™s done to me all the time) but perhaps I donā€™t need to be so uptight about schedules.

Iā€™m also enjoying forging a lot of new connections, both through work-related chats and rekindling old ones from my network. If I compare the five people I spend the most time interacting with now, compared to a year or two ago, it feels like itā€™s shifting in the right direction.*

šŸŒµ What do I wish could have gone differently?

Itā€™s been a while since Iā€™ve been repeatedly chased for my work**, or at least how Iā€™m going about it. And I get it ā€” I probably donā€™t appear to be as ā€˜on itā€™ (even though I believe I can get to the same outcome) in part because of my aversion to picking up the phone. Plus there are business pressures to be mindful of. But whatā€™s surprising to me is the difference in feeling it leaves when you feel your autonomy is slipping away. Maybe Iā€™ve been lucky to not feel that pressure for long enough, that I now need to recondition myself to it?

šŸ’” What do I need to remember?

Slept on a few of my learnings from Anil Gabaā€™s lecture at the INSEAD reunion weekend. He made the business argument for diversity in a similar way to Matt Syed, but added a few interesting layers:

  • What makes for meaningful diversity depends on the context ā€” it should be the leaderā€™s role to identify and shape this context
  • Whereas diversity speaks to the composition of the group, inclusivity can be framed as a good process for combining group judgments to minimize bias
  • Donā€™t fall for the trap of cutting the individual underperformer from a team. Instead consider the strongest composition of the remaining members, again from a D&I lens

A version of that last one comes up in the product delivery team context when youā€™re looking at rotations or rolling off teammates after a given milestone. I can imagine a future where our business considers and recommends moves from a D&I lens as well as the existing factors we look at today.

šŸ“š What did I discover?

Loving this visual essay ā€” a hands-on walkthrough about how to combat exploitative product models (aka attention monsters) from the inside.

Hereā€™s a spicy take on ā€œthe customer is always rightā€ ā€” does it follow that ā€œemployees are generally wrongā€ in an innovation context? Perhaps, when they offer solutions to their own problems rather than those of the customer.***

Fascinating article that Lisa spotted on tech salaries in and around the Netherlands. I wonder if this trend is manifesting itself in London as well?

And this last one is just plain funny. Humbled to have found it!

šŸ  AOB

Was due back into London last week, but extended my stay in Geneva to look after Lisa while she wasnā€™t feeling her best. As a result we were able to enjoy more home-cooked meals together, finish the latest Stranger Things, and I even got to soak in some lake vibes on a sunny Saturday. A great decision!

Summer garden in full bloom at Perle du Lac

Although I couldnā€™t join in person, I still quite enjoyed dialing into this weekā€™s ā€˜secret societyā€™ meet šŸ¤­. We watched parts of a great Diary of a CEO interview around happiness ā€” then had a lively discussion about managing expectations, embracing the downs alongside the ups for perspective it gives, and seeking contentment in the long run.

I harped on the word ā€œdeserveā€ during our discussion (in my view, a source of toxicity) because it sets incorrect expectations about how the world works. Should you buy into the thesis that happiness equals reality minus expectations, thereā€™s little good that a belief in deserving does for your long term happiness. Your expectations are only met in the best case, but most of the time youā€™re setting yourself up for disappointment.

Why embrace downside without potential upside? Better I think to try to remove it from your vocabulary.

*I used to be shier about reaching out, and got in my head a lot about whether the other person even wanted to hear from me or had time to respond. Turns out, when they donā€™t, itā€™s fine, nothing bad actually happens. So Iā€™m glad to see myself reaching out with more intention, and trying to maintain contact with folks who are happy to go beyond surface-level chats. I wonder if Iā€™ll eventually get a Twitter friend into the top five ā€” maybe after I finish taking Kevonā€™s course for a spin.

**Iā€™m usually in the chaserā€™s seat, and even that much I try to go about differently, so that the other party doesnā€™t feel that Iā€™m breathing down their neck. Whatā€™s the virtual/remote version of breathing down oneā€™s neck ā€” is it breathing down your DMs?

***Cue the common UX refrain: you are not the user.

--

--

Sean K. Gabriel
Captainā€™s Log: Supplemental

Aloha (šŸ¤™ļ½”ā—•ā€æā€æā—•ļ½”)šŸ¤™ big on team building & lean product dev. Author @ aspiringpm.com. Thinking aloud with #weeknotes. Works best when caffeinated ā˜•ļø